Abused Swan

Abused Swan
Po Box 52
Comstock Park, MI 49321
United States
ph: 616-322-5279
secretary@abusedswan.com

Psychological Evaluation

Judge Patricia Gardner ordered Deanna

for a psychological evaluation with

Human Resource Associates

When Deanna was order by her Judge to have a Psychological Evaluation with the Human Resource Associates, Deanna called another mother who had been ordered for a Psychological Evaluation by the same organization to discuss her experience. She found that Jeff Zieliszewski was the person who conducted this Mothers evaluation and the results were very negative. Jeff provided a very grave report. With this information,

Deanna elected to request Jeff to conduct her Evaluation

and her results were the same….very negative.

Because of what she learned from the Mother she spoke too, Deanna brought a tape recorder to her consultation. When playing the interview back, Jeff misquotes Deanna several times and uses vocabulary that Deanna never used.

The report states “Deanna quit a job before she was fired for inappropriate conduct around residents”. What Deanna actually talked about, was being accused by co-workers for inappropriate conduct that never took place.

The report also stated “Deanna lost a job due to fatigue and memory loss”. Deanna resigned from her job at the Apartment Complex where she lived in because her furnace had mold and three inches of debris on the furnace that made her sick. A Mold Specialist rated her Apartment a “Category 3”, which means it is detrimental to your health. In other words, Deanna could have died from the toxic levels.

In addition, Jeff’s report states, “I grabbed him and spanked him and he got scolded.” Deanna never used the word scolded and has no clue what Jeff is even talking about in regards to the paragraph this sentence is in.

Jeff states Deanna has a “Personality Disorder NOS” that includes “attention seeking and anti-social characteristics”. (Deanna’s friends laugh at this one. Deanna is known as a social butterfly. Deanna does not need to seek attention, her personality attracts men for miles.) Deanna “displays significant passive-aggressive and manipulative techniques”. (If you are aggressive in Court it is a bad thing and if you are passive aggressive in Court it’s also a bad thing. I guess if you are unemotional and just stand in court with a dumb look on your face your good for the Judge.)

Deanna’s favorite is that she “tends to be quite oppositional and defiant, particularly to authority”. (This happens to be the only truthful diagnosis by Jeff. When one impeaches a Judge, it can be seen as being oppositional and defiant.) During the evaluation Jeff stated, Judge Gardner tends to “punish people.” Isn’t the Family Court System about laws and the criminal court system about punishment? This is part of the reason people are requesting the Impeachment of Judge Gardner.

When Deanna’s friends describe her to others they say, “You would think she is a Lawyer”. Deanna quit dressing up for Court because people were asking her to represent them while she waited for her case to be heard by the Judge. One of Deanna’s own teacher begged her to get a Law Degree. Several people have told Deanna she should become a Lawyer. Deanna always replies, “I refuse to be a “Lying Lawyer”. So Deanna asks, “Do Lawyers have Personality Disorder NOS” that includes attention seeking and antisocial characteristics. Do lawyers display significant passive-aggressive and manipulative techniques? I think we all know the answer to this. So Deanna will accept this diagnosis if Jeff admits to the fact that this is the typical personality of lawyers and judges and therefore is the issues that Deanna has with Donna Mobilia (the GAL in her case) and judge Patricia Gardner.

Finally, Jeff states, “She has also networked with others who tend to reinforce and nurture her pathology”. Frankly, individual Mental Health counseling would likely be a waste of resources. Frankly Jeff, your evaluation was a waste of $300 that the tax-payers paid out of the ADR fund. Deanna is just thankful that the Court did not pay the $675 the Human Resource Associate originally requested.

What a waste of tax-payers money.

How do you feel about paying $300 for a good laugh?

Send your comments to secretary@abusedswan.com.