Welcome To Abused Swan
| Abused Swan |
Judge Patricia Gardner of the 17th Circuit Court continued to threaten the
Owner of this website, Deanna Kloostra, that she would put her in jail. To
combat this Deanna joined her judges church so that the judge would have to
answer to her church family as to why Deanna was in jail. Deanna also post
here if she will be in court and when her court date is. If the court information
is not removed or updated, it is because the courts have placed Deanna
where she is unable to change the information. Judges are known to put
mothers in mental institutions or jail to keep them quiet when they speak out.
Owner of this website, Deanna Kloostra, that she would put her in jail. To
combat this Deanna joined her judges church so that the judge would have to
answer to her church family as to why Deanna was in jail. Deanna also post
here if she will be in court and when her court date is. If the court information
is not removed or updated, it is because the courts have placed Deanna
where she is unable to change the information. Judges are known to put
mothers in mental institutions or jail to keep them quiet when they speak out.
When all mothers' are viewed from the perspective of the story, "The Ugly Duckling," others gain an
understanding of what these mothers have gone through.
Now the duck has custody of her children and the court is allowing this to happen.
Regardless of the mental, physical, and emotional abuse these mothers possess an inner radiance.
The swan was chosen for the symbol of grace and beauty that these abused mother’s represent.
While Deanna was looking for other mothers in her area that were going through the same situation, she started finding mothers
that had illegally lost custody of their children in the foster care system, and had Judge Patricia Gardner. Because of this the web
site is split into two sections.
 |
| |
 |
| |
 |
| |
 |
| |
 |
Abused Swan is based on the story of the "Ugly Duckling." |
| Print your own Abused Swan Poster Green Girl Hands Beach Native American |
| American Mothers are in distress and extreme danger! |
| American Mothers At War Flag! |
THE BLACK HOLE OF PEDOPHILIA IN AMERICA
Most mothers heading down the divorce and custody road have
no idea that they are destined for judicial entrapment, extortion,
exploitation, and total loss. They don't want to upset the apple
cart, appear to be contentious, or be judged guilty by
association, as they follow well-meaning advice about going
through a divorce in the family court system. Who wants to piss
off the judge? Mothers convince themselves that it can't happen
to them. Worse, no one believes a protective mother who says
the court is not protecting her child
"The courts would never do that," everyone says.
"Fathers are the ones being discriminated against, not
mothers," say many. "Fathers have a right to see their children
too. I'm sure you don't have all the facts."
"Report it to the Department of Children and Families," some
complain. "The state agencies will stop it immediately. You are
mandated by law to report it and they are mandated by law to
stop it!"
"The mother must be the problem," still others argue. "You know
how these divorce cases go. People tell all kinds of lies to get
custody of their children."
Protective mothers rationalize it this way: "These must be 'bad'
mothers. You know, difficult women. I'm a good mother. It won't
happen to me. My lawyer will handle it."
Fighting their own private battles, with their private lawyers, no
one wants to get involved in someone else's problems, and no
one wants their dirty laundry aired for the world to see. Mum's
the word.
The problem is, what we are talking about here is a massive
national and global epidemic in sex slavery and pedophilia that
makes the Penn State University pedophile scandal look like a
bonafidé success story. In that case, someone caught the thief
with his hands in the cookie jar -- or the kiddie's nightie. Penn
State was the tip of the top of the peak of the iceberg of sexual
horrors that children are experiencing and mothers are fighting
against. There is an ocean of evidence for any clear thinking
person to see.
But who is watching?
There is little or no U.S. Department of Justice oversight of the
billions of dollars in U.S. Department of Health and Human
Services monies that are funding the black holes of Family
Courts. The mass media is almost completely silent.
On March 2, 2011, journalist Peter Jamison published an article
in the San Francisco Weekly News that might be a blueprint for
similar cases across North America. Otherwise, and virtually all
across the country, local to national newspapers, major media
outlets, syndicated news reporters and TV stations have gone
silent in the face of the evidence.
In Peter Jamison's "California Family Courts Helping Pedophiles,
Batterers Get Child Custody" blueprint, the story goes like this:
mother suspects father of sexual abuse against child; mother
asks Family Court to investigate; court assigns psychologist to
evaluate parents; psychologist declares that mother invented
charges against father; mother is labeled with psychopathology
based on discredited psychological theories; Family Court judge
delivers child to abusive father.
The father (Rex Anderson) in one of Peter Jamison's blueprint
cases is today serving a 23-year sentence at Pleasant Valley
State Prison in California. In 2003 he plead no contest to 25
counts of sex crimes against his daughter, including child
molestation, sexual penetration of a child with a foreign object,
and use of a minor to create pornography. When she turned 18,
his daughter left his care and reported years of abuse to police.
"Seldom are a parent's allegations against an estranged former
spouse rejected out of hand, only to be vindicated so
completely," wrote Jamison. "Yet observers say the Anderson
case represents just one unfortunate outcome of systemic
problems in the Family Courts' methods for investigating
accusations of abuse."
In another case examined by Jamison, the judge -- no longer on
the bench -- looked back on her decision with woe. "[The
mother] was right to be crying, and hysterical, because no one
would believe her. I signed a court order handing a kid over to
someone who turned out to be a pedophile."
Jamison notes that looking out for the children who find
themselves in the middle of bitter divorces is the most important
function of the state's Family Courts, and arguably one of the
most significant duties of the judiciary as a whole. "Yet evidence
has mounted in recent years that it is a responsibility in which
Family Court officials are sometimes failing dramatically."
However, child sexual abuse and organized crime like this is not
a matter of 'sometimes' failing dramatically. When even one
child is taken away from his or her loving mother and delivered
to a sex abuser it is a matter of ruining -- and sometimes ending
-- a life.
The problems with Family Courts pervade all levels of the
federal and state systems, and no United States citizens are
immune: rich and poor are exploited, only differently. At the root
of the problem are these central truths:
• The five billion dollar a year budget of the U.S. Department of
Health and Human Services (DHHS) provides a black hole of
funding that filters millions of dollars down to 'gatekeepers'
posted to key positions in Family Courts, state agencies, law-
enforcement, and affiliated non-profit organizations that have
learned how to milk the system;
• Over the past 50 years, a destructive Father's Manifesto
movement -- falsely billing itself as a father's 'rights' movement
-- has evolved into a hydra that has virtually overtaken judicial
systems and social services, and it now uses them to persecute
mothers and destroy families according to the otherwise
reasonable dictate that access and visitation with both parents
is in 'the best interest of the child'.
• The United States is both a domestic and an international hub
for a trillion dollars a year sex industry in trafficking in women
and children.
Why are Family Courts manhandling good mothers?
Pretending to assist men to become responsible parents,
federal programs operating under the banners of 'Responsible
Fatherhood', 'Access to Visitation Enforcement' (supervised
visitation for noncustodial parents), and 'Child Support
Enforcement' have perpetuated abuse of women and children
through the family court system. These government programs
are not producing responsible fathers, but motherless children,
in order to advance the agenda of the so-called 'fathers' rights'
movement.
"Father's Manifesto Groups differ from Father's Rights Groups,"
wrote someone on the Carver Country Corruption blog dealing
with identical issues in Minnesota that are herein exposed for
Connecticut. "There are many honest and wonderful Father's
Rights Groups that uphold standards of protecting children and
forming equality among fathers and mothers. Father's Manifesto
Groups are corrupt groups that sell children into the hands of
sexual abuse and severe traumatic situations for monetary gain
and feelings of superiority over helpless persons... such as the
parent fighting for the rights of their child and them as a parent.
Make yourself aware and get educated on this epidemic in so
you are not made a victim."
"'Father's rights' as a political agenda, has nothing to do with
actual parenting rights or responsibilities," the gag-ordered
Carver County Blog continues. "These Father's Manifesto
organizations are misogynist anarchy and militia groups that
define fatherhood in terms of male ownership of children in male-
headed households. In order to maintain control over 'families',
father's groups promote violence, advocating the use of
'domestic discipline'. Their membership is comprised of virulent
men 'fighting feminism' and affirmative action, establishing
'patriarchy under God' and even trying to repeal the 19th
Amendment."
Of course, it is not only women and children who are abused --
across the nation good men and good fathers are waking up to
the national epidemic of pedophilia and sex trafficking involving
federal and state governments and officials, and the horrors of
'Family Courts'.
Based on laws enacted by the Clinton Administration in the mid-
1990's -- under the lobbying of the 'Contract on America' --
problems originate with the U.S. Department of Health and
Human Services and programs like the Transitional Assistance
for Needy Families (TANF). Based on the financial and
economic 'incentives', and with zero oversight or regulation, the
system uses Family Courts and state agencies to destroy
families.
More about the courts sacrificing children!
Government Programs That Fail Mothers
Saunders Report From The University of Michigan
Most mothers heading down the divorce and custody road have
no idea that they are destined for judicial entrapment, extortion,
exploitation, and total loss. They don't want to upset the apple
cart, appear to be contentious, or be judged guilty by
association, as they follow well-meaning advice about going
through a divorce in the family court system. Who wants to piss
off the judge? Mothers convince themselves that it can't happen
to them. Worse, no one believes a protective mother who says
the court is not protecting her child
"The courts would never do that," everyone says.
"Fathers are the ones being discriminated against, not
mothers," say many. "Fathers have a right to see their children
too. I'm sure you don't have all the facts."
"Report it to the Department of Children and Families," some
complain. "The state agencies will stop it immediately. You are
mandated by law to report it and they are mandated by law to
stop it!"
"The mother must be the problem," still others argue. "You know
how these divorce cases go. People tell all kinds of lies to get
custody of their children."
Protective mothers rationalize it this way: "These must be 'bad'
mothers. You know, difficult women. I'm a good mother. It won't
happen to me. My lawyer will handle it."
Fighting their own private battles, with their private lawyers, no
one wants to get involved in someone else's problems, and no
one wants their dirty laundry aired for the world to see. Mum's
the word.
The problem is, what we are talking about here is a massive
national and global epidemic in sex slavery and pedophilia that
makes the Penn State University pedophile scandal look like a
bonafidé success story. In that case, someone caught the thief
with his hands in the cookie jar -- or the kiddie's nightie. Penn
State was the tip of the top of the peak of the iceberg of sexual
horrors that children are experiencing and mothers are fighting
against. There is an ocean of evidence for any clear thinking
person to see.
But who is watching?
There is little or no U.S. Department of Justice oversight of the
billions of dollars in U.S. Department of Health and Human
Services monies that are funding the black holes of Family
Courts. The mass media is almost completely silent.
On March 2, 2011, journalist Peter Jamison published an article
in the San Francisco Weekly News that might be a blueprint for
similar cases across North America. Otherwise, and virtually all
across the country, local to national newspapers, major media
outlets, syndicated news reporters and TV stations have gone
silent in the face of the evidence.
In Peter Jamison's "California Family Courts Helping Pedophiles,
Batterers Get Child Custody" blueprint, the story goes like this:
mother suspects father of sexual abuse against child; mother
asks Family Court to investigate; court assigns psychologist to
evaluate parents; psychologist declares that mother invented
charges against father; mother is labeled with psychopathology
based on discredited psychological theories; Family Court judge
delivers child to abusive father.
The father (Rex Anderson) in one of Peter Jamison's blueprint
cases is today serving a 23-year sentence at Pleasant Valley
State Prison in California. In 2003 he plead no contest to 25
counts of sex crimes against his daughter, including child
molestation, sexual penetration of a child with a foreign object,
and use of a minor to create pornography. When she turned 18,
his daughter left his care and reported years of abuse to police.
"Seldom are a parent's allegations against an estranged former
spouse rejected out of hand, only to be vindicated so
completely," wrote Jamison. "Yet observers say the Anderson
case represents just one unfortunate outcome of systemic
problems in the Family Courts' methods for investigating
accusations of abuse."
In another case examined by Jamison, the judge -- no longer on
the bench -- looked back on her decision with woe. "[The
mother] was right to be crying, and hysterical, because no one
would believe her. I signed a court order handing a kid over to
someone who turned out to be a pedophile."
Jamison notes that looking out for the children who find
themselves in the middle of bitter divorces is the most important
function of the state's Family Courts, and arguably one of the
most significant duties of the judiciary as a whole. "Yet evidence
has mounted in recent years that it is a responsibility in which
Family Court officials are sometimes failing dramatically."
However, child sexual abuse and organized crime like this is not
a matter of 'sometimes' failing dramatically. When even one
child is taken away from his or her loving mother and delivered
to a sex abuser it is a matter of ruining -- and sometimes ending
-- a life.
The problems with Family Courts pervade all levels of the
federal and state systems, and no United States citizens are
immune: rich and poor are exploited, only differently. At the root
of the problem are these central truths:
• The five billion dollar a year budget of the U.S. Department of
Health and Human Services (DHHS) provides a black hole of
funding that filters millions of dollars down to 'gatekeepers'
posted to key positions in Family Courts, state agencies, law-
enforcement, and affiliated non-profit organizations that have
learned how to milk the system;
• Over the past 50 years, a destructive Father's Manifesto
movement -- falsely billing itself as a father's 'rights' movement
-- has evolved into a hydra that has virtually overtaken judicial
systems and social services, and it now uses them to persecute
mothers and destroy families according to the otherwise
reasonable dictate that access and visitation with both parents
is in 'the best interest of the child'.
• The United States is both a domestic and an international hub
for a trillion dollars a year sex industry in trafficking in women
and children.
Why are Family Courts manhandling good mothers?
Pretending to assist men to become responsible parents,
federal programs operating under the banners of 'Responsible
Fatherhood', 'Access to Visitation Enforcement' (supervised
visitation for noncustodial parents), and 'Child Support
Enforcement' have perpetuated abuse of women and children
through the family court system. These government programs
are not producing responsible fathers, but motherless children,
in order to advance the agenda of the so-called 'fathers' rights'
movement.
"Father's Manifesto Groups differ from Father's Rights Groups,"
wrote someone on the Carver Country Corruption blog dealing
with identical issues in Minnesota that are herein exposed for
Connecticut. "There are many honest and wonderful Father's
Rights Groups that uphold standards of protecting children and
forming equality among fathers and mothers. Father's Manifesto
Groups are corrupt groups that sell children into the hands of
sexual abuse and severe traumatic situations for monetary gain
and feelings of superiority over helpless persons... such as the
parent fighting for the rights of their child and them as a parent.
Make yourself aware and get educated on this epidemic in so
you are not made a victim."
"'Father's rights' as a political agenda, has nothing to do with
actual parenting rights or responsibilities," the gag-ordered
Carver County Blog continues. "These Father's Manifesto
organizations are misogynist anarchy and militia groups that
define fatherhood in terms of male ownership of children in male-
headed households. In order to maintain control over 'families',
father's groups promote violence, advocating the use of
'domestic discipline'. Their membership is comprised of virulent
men 'fighting feminism' and affirmative action, establishing
'patriarchy under God' and even trying to repeal the 19th
Amendment."
Of course, it is not only women and children who are abused --
across the nation good men and good fathers are waking up to
the national epidemic of pedophilia and sex trafficking involving
federal and state governments and officials, and the horrors of
'Family Courts'.
Based on laws enacted by the Clinton Administration in the mid-
1990's -- under the lobbying of the 'Contract on America' --
problems originate with the U.S. Department of Health and
Human Services and programs like the Transitional Assistance
for Needy Families (TANF). Based on the financial and
economic 'incentives', and with zero oversight or regulation, the
system uses Family Courts and state agencies to destroy
families.
More about the courts sacrificing children!
Government Programs That Fail Mothers
Saunders Report From The University of Michigan
| 1-800-706-4951 |